Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; view has a deprecated constructor in /home2/edit/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/includes/view.inc on line 19

Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; views_display has a deprecated constructor in /home2/edit/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/includes/view.inc on line 1910

Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; views_many_to_one_helper has a deprecated constructor in /home2/edit/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/includes/handlers.inc on line 616
Aspect Ratio in Sony 9000 dvs | Editsuite.com

Hello Editsuite.com friends,

Due to tons of abuse, we now require that you request user access by sending us your Login, Name, Email Address, Phone Number, and Profession by submitting that info HERE.  I'll review your request and try to get back to you within the week.  You can't imagine how many folk want to trash forums with bogas advertising. 

Also, please help us gain enough Facebook "Likes" to have a custom Facebook URL!  

--Gary Lieberman

Aspect Ratio in Sony 9000 dvs

4 replies [Last post]
Enric
User offline. Last seen 6 years 51 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 26 Oct 2005

Hello,

I work with a sony 9000 dvs and the software version is Menu 5.21, PNL1 5.21, DCU1 4.10, SWR1 5.21 and DME1 5.21.

The question is: I need work with the aspect relation in 16:9. The product is SD but not in 4:3 , it will be in 16:9. I've seen in the ENG Setup-Format-Active Line/Aspect differents possibilities, Screen Aspect 16:9 4:3 and Independ How it's work?

In the submenu Switcher Aspect and the DME Aspect have the possibility to change the aspect independently for diferents parts, ME1, ME2, PP, User, CH1, CH2, etc How it's works?

I ask this because I'm trying change the aspect in some concret parts or totally and doesn' work. Don't do anything. It's possible that I don't use it correctly? Or it's a future option?

Thank you for all,

Enric

sausan
sausan's picture
User offline. Last seen 7 years 34 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 28 Mar 2007
It is along message, I am sorry in advance, here below information about DVS 9000: *It is 1.5ME *The panel version is 2.2 *Manue version is 2.2 The possibility of hardware failure is less because there is ME1 in the switcher (wipe ,mix ..ect) but it doesnot appear in output ports and in ME1 buttons . In the page 7321 the table as below: Operation Assign bank enable ME/1 1st row enable M/E1 2nd row enable P/P 3rd row - - 4th row - My question, Is it possible the 1st and 2nd rows have ME/1 ? ,and when I try turning off the dual mode ,the tow bank are affected . -Could you please explain a simple block diagram where does the ME/ signal go after processing and how is routed to the output port and ME/1 buttons ? -How could I reset the switcher to factory default set and is it helpful to solve the problem? Thanks a lot
S
Bob Ennis
User offline. Last seen 4 years 36 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 24 Aug 2005
It is possible that one of the actual M/E cards has failed. In this case, you can select any physical M/E as a logical M/E, but you'll always end up one M/E short (assuming that there has been a hardware failure). Another possibility is that M/E 1 or another M/E may be in DUAL mode (Page 7321), where one M/E shows up as all unshifted sources while another M/E shows up with all of that 1st M/E's shifted sources. Check the M/E LED displays to see if more than one M/E has the same label. If this is the case, turning off DUAL for that M/E should restore normal operation. Or maybe the M/E has been disabled - also page 7321.

Bob Ennis

sausan
sausan's picture
User offline. Last seen 7 years 34 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 28 Mar 2007
Hello i have a proplem with one of DVS- 9000SF switcher ,the proplem is: 1. there is no ME1 PGM output . 2. To check the fault i open the page 7331.5 , when i press( M/E1 : assign the physical PP as logical M/E-1), the M/E1PGM signal appears , but there is no signal on P-P PGM output . could you please help to solve the proplem. thank you all, sausan IMN Technical Department
S
Bob Ennis
User offline. Last seen 4 years 36 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Enric - Switchers by themselves do not create 4x3 or 16x9. There are exactly as many pixels in an SD 4x3 image as there are in an SD 16x9 image. The only difference is in the shape of the pixel, more square or more rectangular. It is the acquisition device that works in 4x3 or 16x9 - things such as cameras, VTR's, or CG's create the shape of the pixels. The switcher just passes this information through. What you are seeing in the aspect ratio area of the menu is how the switcher generates such things as patterns. In order to match video that was created in 16x9, the switcher can horizontally compress certain wipes (such as circles) so that they do not appear oblong. In fact, a good way to check whether or not you have selected the correct aspect ratio in the switcher is to put up a circle wipe & see if it looks like a circle (correct) or an egg (incorrect). The DME selections for aspect allow you to switch between a +4/-4 & +3/-3 coordinate system with a +16/-16 & +9/-9 system. The DME's, just like the switcher, are blind to the actual aspect ratio of the input source and will not convert a 4x3 source to a 16x9 source without manually adjusting the DME's 2D ASPECT controls (found on the panel as part of building effects). The reason that you're probably not seeing any change is because the final determiner of what an image looks like is your monitor. You will need to set your monitor for 16x9 - then your 16x9 material will look OK. After you do this, put up that circle wipe mentioned earlier...in the menu, cycle between 4x3 & 16x9 and you will see the shape of the wipe change. That's a confirmation that the menu selection is designed to match the aspect ratio of the wipes to the image, and you can set this ratio on an M/E by M/E basis (as you noted). But you'll see that changing the button has no effect on the image.

Bob Ennis